Category: Uncategorized
-
THE “AMERICA FIRST” SCAM: HOW THE 2025 NATIONAL SECURITYH STRATEGY SELLS GLOBAL DOMINANCE AS POPULISM
The newly released 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) promises to put Americans first—but its real priorities reveal a costly agenda of global power projection that serves elites rather than citizens. — THE GRAND ILLUSION The document’s rhetoric sounds populist: it rejects “globalism,” prioritises sovereignty, and promises to protect American workers. But beneath the surface, its…
-
AMERICA FIRST: BRINGING BACK THE ROOSEVELT RULE IN THE 2025 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY (NSS)
MAKING NATIONAL SECURITY SERVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Dear Essential American Citizen, Hopefully, but not you are aware that last week the DC elite policy makers published the 2025 National Security Strategy. I say not. If you are like me, you were not invited to join in the development of the NSS. We were not involved…
-

FLEXIBILITY WITHOUT PURPOSE
The United States once had a framework for war: Clear objective. Overwhelming force. Public support. Defined end state. It was imperfect—but it was coherent. That coherence is now gone. What has replaced it is not a new doctrine. It is the absence of one.
-
THE STRAIT WILL NOT OPEN BECAUSE THEY DEMAND IT
THE STRAIT WILL NOT OPEN BECAUSE THEY DEMAND IT April 3, 2026 Tom Raquer Lt. Col. (Ret.), USAF • Southeast Asia Foreign Area Officer From the series: After the Winter — Collapse, Spring, and the New First Turning Writing for First Turning Strategists PREVIEW Forty nations can meet. They can issue statements. They can demand…
-
THE WAR POWERS TEST
Authority Without Consent Tom Raquer Lt. Col. (Ret.), U.S. Air Force • Southeast Asia Foreign Area Officer From the series: After the Winter — Collapse, Spring, and the New First Turning Published: March 26, 2026 PREVIEW The United States is now engaged in a war. That is not a rhetorical description. It is how the…
-

-

HOW CHINA SEES THIS WAR
This is not a war China needs to win. It is a system already producing pressure. One side is engaged in the fight. The other is positioned to gain from the network’s evolution. And in prolonged conflict— Advantage does not always go to the side that acts. It often goes to the side that can…
-

Why Decapitation Fails Against Systems: Iran and the Limits of U.S. Strategy
Key Takeaways * Decapitation is ineffective against distributed systems * Iran’s structure prioritises continuity * War shifts toward attrition and endurance * Political sustainability becomes decisive Strategy must align with system structure
-

THE END OF THE MARITIME SECURITY FRAMEWORK
Key Points * The global system depends on secure maritime trade routes * U.S. power has underwritten that system since World War II * This role is a strategic choice, not a permanent condition * Internal pressures are now constraining external commitments * Chokepoint disruptions reveal systemic vulnerability The system is shifting from stabilising to…
